Several years ago, I was back east. My dear friend, Cheryl’s, mother had died after a long illness, early-onset Alzheimer’s. Cheryl had been her mother, Daisy’s primary caregiver since she was a 25-year-old psychology intern. Fortunately, Cheryl lives in her childhood home in a wonderful neighborhood. When I visit her, neighbor’s come over to greet me because they know that I am one of Cheryl’s people. Nonetheless, it was incredibly difficult for her, a single woman finishing up graduate school and starting her career, to care for her mom. Cheryl has her own health challenges, which are exacerbated by stress, and required multiple surgeries during her mom’s life. After several years, Daisy entered a nursing home. As her life neared its end, her best friend, Shirley, a retired nurse told Cheryl that her mom’s time was coming to a close. It is so hard to know exactly when someone is going to die and even harder to let someone go. Daisy had been a single parent to Cheryl and they were very close. She died before a priest could come out to perform last rites, Anointing of the Sick. The parish priest did come afterwards and performed the final Roman Catholic sacrament.
I arrived a few days later. A group of neighbors set up a repast of Trinidadian food that had been brought by caterers (Cheryl’s parents were both from Trinidad) while the rest of us attended the funeral. The officiant had been Daisy and Cheryl’s parish priest many years before and was now a cardinal and a family friend. The service was beautiful. One of Cheryl’s friends, a neighbor, sang. The cardinal also sang parts of the mass and he had a very nice voice. After mass was ended, we went to Cheryl and Daisy’s home for the repast and celebrated Daisy’s life.
I stayed on for a few days. I went to mass at Cheryl’s parish. The priest who had performed Daisy’s last rites presided over mass. The theme of his homily was “what are you waiting for?” To my horror, he used the story of being called to perform last rights on Daisy after she’d died. He went on and on. I left church humiliated and livid on behalf of my dear friend who had been nothing but a wonderful daughter not to mention the fact that he knew that she was not only a member of his parish, but one who had just lost her mother to a truly horrible disease. Both Cheryl and this priest had a story about what had transpired. They were very different stories. It is easy to call one of them right and one of them wrong. I know which one I would call wrong!
I have not written any entries in this blog for nearly a month. I have used the month thinking about the stories we tell that provide meaning to us in explaining our life experiences. Breast cancer survivors tell lots of meaningful stories. So do heart attack survivors, by the way. Not surprisingly, they are some of the very same stories about “kicking illnesses ass”, about “being given a second lease on life”, and even the perception of illness as a “gift”. There are also the stories of “My life will never be the same” and “What’s going on? This is horrible!”. There are also national heart awareness days, including the recent “Wear Red Day” to raise awareness of cardiac disease in women, the number one cause of women.
I have been living in a particular breast cancer blogging community for nearly six years now. I find that I bristle at some of the narratives told by heart attack survivors. I have also not delved deeply into the cyber community for SCAD survivors. There is a lot of raw terror in that community. It makes sense. Most of the women are young, had a heart attack out of the blue, and they have cardiologists who don’t understand their condition. Those are the women who have a narrative of chaos and literal heartbreak. I don’t bristle at their stories. I just feel very sad for their suffering. It’s the catch phrases used by the women who by all appearances seem to be coping well. They are the ones who are more likely to use the phrases that are so controversial in the breast cancer world.
Yesterday, I thought back to perspectives of my friend and the priest around Daisy’s death. The priest’s actions were clearly “wrong” in that they were unskilled and did not demonstrate compassion for others. The stories they told were very different. I do think that Cheryl and the priest shared something very important. They were both dealing with suffering. How was the priest suffering, you ask? Admittedly, I don’t know his mind but I have some guesses, based on his job. Priests are on-call constantly. And they are on-call for decades. Not everyone is up to that every minute. I can see someone getting wrapped up in the stress of this and having a fit about an inconvenience. This does not excuse his behavior but it offers a possible explanation.
The stories we tell may either help or amplify our suffering. The helpful story I tell myself may be one that would cause suffering to someone else in a similar situation. This is why the “cancer is a gift” narrative doesn’t bother me the way it does some others. I can see that it may help some people. As long as people don’t explicitly tell me how I should view my own life experience, I am fine with it. What I have been struggling with is the backlash against these narratives. It is one thing to say, for example, “Cancer was not a gift for me” and quite another thing to say, “Cancer is a gift to no one.” To me, that causes the same problem as the one that is trying to be solved, that is, prescriptive language that defines experience.
But really, what does it matter to me? And who am I to invalidate anyone’s personal characterization of illness, just based on the ideas? If you want to tell me that “cancer’s a gift”, that’s fine as long as you are not my husband or another close loved one. If you want to tell me “cancer’s never a gift.” That’s also fine. If you don’t like the word, “journey” or any other phrase or word that is currently popular, that’s fine. I define my own experience. And the narrative that I am putting together is dynamic and at times, very messy. I respect myself. I respect you.
As always, I wish you peace, joy, and to be free from suffering.
Thank you for stating this so beautifully Elizabeth. I wrote about it last week but far less eloquently. I keep thinking of the quote about being kind because everyone we meet is fighting a hard battle. The battling metaphor notwithstanding, it’s something I try to remember when I find myself bristling at the actions and words of others that feel far removed from my own experience.
I read your post last week and I love that a consistent thread of work is representing various narratives. I haven’t been part of the synergy in breast cancer blogging for awhile and it was nice to return.
[…] week, the theme of the weekly round-up centered around cancer metaphors and Elizabeth‘s latest post has extended the theme to encompass the stories we tell ourselves to make sense […]
Thank you for this! I wish I’d seen this blog post before I wrote my own ‘storytelling’ post that ran today (I could have saved so much time – because you said it so much better!) I was especially struck by your phrase “The stories we tell may either help or amplify our suffering” That’s exactly what I was trying to say, too.
I’ve often thought that timing is everything when it comes to suffering: in the early days/weeks/months post-Dx, it’s entirely predictable that our stories will focus on “This is horrible!” Of course it’s horrible! Over time, some of us (but not all) can start telling edited stories like the “new lease on life” ones. Some days (and even some hours!) we can be all over the map – but we know that ruminating, especially out loud to others, is not good for us – and definitely amplifies our suffering in the long run.
It’s all very messy, as you say…
Carolyn, thank you so much for reading and commenting. Even more importantly, thank you for your advocacy for women’s cardiac health!
I think you are right about some of the “out loud” ruminating. I have not gotten strongly connected with the SCAD cyber support community. There’s a lot of anxious suffering in the FB groups. I empathize strongly. SCAD is isolating. Fortunately, I just happened to start cardiac rehab at the same time as another woman who’d had a SCAD-induced M.I. We have each other for social support as well as a small group of others from our rehab group, with whom we meet socially every couple of months. SCAD is also isolating because so many cardiologists don’t know how to diagnose or treat it. As a clinical psychologist, however, I have to limit my exposure to the SCAD FB groups. It’s too stressful for me to want to help and not really be able to given the forum and the fact that I am not a medical expert.